George Mason
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
559  Ciara Donohue JR 20:56
858  Amber Hawkins SR 21:19
1,303  Riley Freeland FR 21:48
1,314  Reilly Freeland FR 21:49
1,334  Carolyn Conley JR 21:50
1,741  Sarah Richart SO 22:16
2,052  Khalilah Hamer SO 22:36
2,344  Margaret Morgan SO 23:01
2,523  Allison Rice FR 23:18
2,637  Suzanne Abribat JR 23:30
2,758  Madyson Reilly FR 23:46
3,065  Samantha Wood FR 24:51
3,148  Serenity Chavez FR 25:29
National Rank #168 of 348
Southeast Region Rank #21 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 53.3%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Ciara Donohue Amber Hawkins Riley Freeland Reilly Freeland Carolyn Conley Sarah Richart Khalilah Hamer Margaret Morgan Allison Rice Suzanne Abribat Madyson Reilly
JMU Open Invitational 09/09 1183 20:58 21:18 21:38 21:32 22:32 22:51 23:05 23:01 23:45 23:14
George Mason Invitational 09/30 1180 20:52 21:19 21:51 21:43 22:14 22:54 22:44 23:14 23:17 23:55
Princeton Invitational 10/14 1183 20:51 21:17 21:52 22:00 22:27 22:31 23:26 23:11 23:57
A10 Championship 10/28 1194 20:59 21:26 21:52 21:46 22:03 22:36 23:08 23:31 23:41
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 1210 21:09 21:22 21:48 21:54 22:17 22:32 23:00





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.2 604 0.2 0.7 1.7 3.9 8.0 10.5 13.6 14.8 16.9 11.7 9.2 5.7 2.2 0.9 0.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ciara Donohue 70.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Amber Hawkins 99.4
Riley Freeland 143.5
Reilly Freeland 143.7
Carolyn Conley 146.4
Sarah Richart 180.9
Khalilah Hamer 203.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.2% 0.2 13
14 0.7% 0.7 14
15 1.7% 1.7 15
16 3.9% 3.9 16
17 8.0% 8.0 17
18 10.5% 10.5 18
19 13.6% 13.6 19
20 14.8% 14.8 20
21 16.9% 16.9 21
22 11.7% 11.7 22
23 9.2% 9.2 23
24 5.7% 5.7 24
25 2.2% 2.2 25
26 0.9% 0.9 26
27 0.2% 0.2 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0